Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract In a temporal context, sure outcomes may yield higher utility than risky ones as they are available for the execution of plans before resolution uncertainty. By observing disproportionate preference certainty, empirical research points to fundamental difference between riskless and utility. Chance Theory (CT) accounts this and, in contrast earlier approaches separate utility, does not violate basic rationality principles like first-order stochastic dominance or transitivity. CT evaluates lowest outcome an act with v increments over that outcome, called chances, by subjective expected (EU) u . As consequence treating differently ones, is able explain EU-paradoxes Allais ( Econometrica, 21 (4): 503–546, 1953) rely on certainty effect, also critique EU put forward Rabin 68 (5): 1281–1292, 2000). Moreover, separates risk attitudes strong sense, captured entirely , from attitude towards wealth reflected solely through curvature
منابع مشابه
Chance Theory: A Separation of Riskless and Risky Utility
We present a preference foundation for Chance Theory (CT), a model of decision making under uncertainty where the evaluation of an act depends distinctively on its lowest outcome. This outcome is evaluated with the riskless value function and the potential increments over it are evaluated by subjective expected utility with a risky utility function . In contrast to earlier approaches with mo...
متن کاملOn the Interplay of Riskless and Risky Utility
In developing this papeq I re-read some of Mud Edwards major contributions to the study of behavioral decision making (Edwards, 1954, 1962, 1992; von Wmterfeldt and Edwards, 1986) to remind myself about how he has viewed the developments of a half century of work on individual decision making that began with von Neuman and Morgenstern's (1947) theory of expected utility. I focused on three aspe...
متن کاملSelection of Portfolios with Risky and Riskless Assets: Experimental Tests of Two Expected Utility Models *
Two expected utility models are considered for a multi-period portfolio selection task of a special nature: the generalized logarithmic and negative exponential models. A weak version of the models is formulated in which the single parameter of each of the models is allowed to vary freely from one period to another in order to account for observed individual differences between subjects as well...
متن کاملIndividual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices
Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. Yet, there is no evidence whether people who are loss averse in riskless choices are also loss averse in risky choices. We measure individual-level loss aversion in riskless choices in an endowment effect experiment by eliciting both WTA and WTP from each of our 360 subjects (rand...
متن کاملA Comparison of Portfolio Theory and Weighted Utility Models of Risky Decision Making
Weighted utility models attempt to account for risk preferences in terms of an expectation-like equation applied to the subjective evaluation of probabilities and outcomes, while Portfolio theory assumes that risk preference is a function of expected value and perceived risk. A pair of empirical predictions which contrasts Portfolio theory with all weighted utility models is derived and tested....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0895-5646', '1573-0476']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-022-09385-w